Відео

You... are... a... Genius! Adding glass in front of a virtual camera... Genius!

Great video! 😎

I’ve seen some “home made” LED walls made by mashing together small bezel TVs (usually set vertically) and then fudging the seams so it looks like a big picture window. I suppose it’s possible to blur the images or bring in foreground set pieces to hide seams for other backgrounds but it’s gonna be tricky and might look like crap in the end. Cost - a lot more than green screen and a lot less than a real wall…

Hello Hello, I'm one of the sources for the expensive stuff! Just to add a clarification that I thinks handy to know is the prices we chatted about was specifically to do with a 15m x 5m wall (a previous video of Josh's for scale ua-cam.com/video/bia3F4KbLlA/v-deo.html) so the price can scale even more wildly than what's mentioned on here! We've done shoots with a budget of as little as $1000 a day up to $50,000 a day. This video is one of my favourites you've released! The ability to scale and to be able to use the same tools we've got in our studio for next to no cost is why I love VP!

Jetset is still not working for the live feed from unreal im still waiting for a new tutorial where they can explain their pipeline correctly

Slightly less money is for using metahumans and mocap. I figured everything necessary technically but the mocap. I have actually two options for mocap. Cameras and Captury SW, less than $100 (for cameras, SW is free) or DYI solution using sensors (I wanted to make it opensource on GitHub with tutorials), something about $400. And results aren't much different. I even think that this fits little bit more to Unreal visual style (Even photorealistic production in UE is a bit different image than actual live-action, so it's so fits more to use Metahumans and mocap). And one other reason is to make the production itself easier. You can change camera movement even in postproduction. I found that the easiest approach is to have everything ready and finalizing in Unreal everything, including camera. It's actually more customisable after shooting, because you have the character movement captured in 3D instead of having just 2D video of the actors.

Thanks for the information brother..Love from india

Please Please do some Aximmetry tutorials in the future 🙏 you are our only hope at this point , there is not that much tutorials about it and Virtual Production , i hope i am not alone in this situation , thank you again for your content 😊.

Instead of LED walls, why not use a projector for a poor mans LED wall? some of the corporate projectors hit like 7000 ANSI lumens for pretty cheap (5000 to 7000 ish I believe) and even using a more consumer level one could get great results. You would be limited in motion a bit but still. The guys at FIlm Riot and Adyax have played around with this. The guys at Adnyax have a commercial projector and have done a couple of really cool videos using VP in their tiny studio.

😉

Oh good, another jetset commercial from you. I know of no one who uses this yet was mentioned 8 times in your video. You make good content, quit being a shill for a company that is useless for commercial virtual production work. Other than this the rest of the content in this video was a good primer for others.

Have the phone and got the Seemo pro, now I found out I need a cooling fan, and a tentacle timecode tool. I phone cage-"Please link where you got the one you use", then it's mounting solutions and and and... so not cheap when adding up all the bits and bobs.

Да понятно что в е рисованное

very cool

Thanks

Gaussian (as in Carl Friedrich Gauss) is pronounced "Gow-see-an" not "Gauze-ian"

Hey, this is amazing. All the negativity I've seen in the comments comes from a place of total ignorance. Keep up the good work.

I honestly think you should rename this video "I invented a new type of camera lens", because you did, and it's not clickbait, and I'd have clicked 10x faster 😂

Hey. Is the process for ue 5.4 same ?

outstanding work man. dip in quality on the close up face shpts. Think it's maybe because your camera is a lot sharper than the environment. still awesome though!!!

What an amazing display of creativity :)

This is cool and all and I like your enthusiasm but let me tell you why this is a BAD idea. It's bad because other than lighting, the rest of the effects are being automatically done by our own human eyes. It might be a surprise to you, but our eyes can only really focus on a 1cm² area and the rest is always blurred. Distortion, motion blur and all that stuff, are happening already by our eyes. This is also the same reason why James Cameron's 3D effect in his movies is total garbage! If you try to focus on anything other than what he wanted you to, you lose the effect completely. Stop using scripted distortion effects and let the viewer see what THEY want to see. This is why the 3D effect in the Resident Evil movies is vastly superior to Avatar's, because it is visible and viewable in the entire FOV, without garbage techniques like Auto-Focus and distortion effects.

Do you think your real life would be more realistic if you tacked on some lenses to your face so you got spherical aberration and lens glare and so on? Technically this is cool, and certainly useful as an effect, but the idea that the default VFX is "fake" or "unrealistic" is misguided.

Found out about Jetset Cine through you and a few other early adopters. Currently working with my shows department to employ this for a segment on a high-end UA-cam docuseries. This is very exciting. Even our 1080p phone tests are excellent; the Accsoon is in the post! Love your vids!

Joshua do you have any ideas for how to fix "thin hair with shallow depth of field" with the path tracer or with octane? Seems like a massive problem that not many people are talking about. It just continues to suck in 5.4! :-)

Amazing! The next step is to make CMOS or CCD noise, and maybe even amp glow

Idk... cool idea but it all seems very heavy handed to me. Think I'd rather just do it in post for the extra control, but cool little experiment!

The 3D environment looked like a bad ps2 game haha

Great job! creative idea, helpful tools, and an amazing result

Is his scalp moving as he moves?

thank you for the video, but i have a question, how do we get reflections from translusent material? do you have any tricks to achieve it?

how does this effect how you approach virtual production? Do the artifacts and virtual focal lengths make it harder to realistically composite your live action footage?

pfft, anyone with any sense knows that it's CGI, so, who cares?

anamorphic would be sick you should do one

😁

What was the song playing during your video?

Putting this on the long list of things I never knew I wanted to know

someone already did this around 9 years ago lol 35mm is best you can find some really detailed articles on google which is where you probably learned this.

Dude, I am subscribed to too many channels already. But this video alone is worthy of one.

ahah.funny video

My name is Joshua Kerr too! You probably hate me for taking all the joshkerr usernames/domains. 🙂

You accidentally created a lens market but virtual

Not interested in having my eyes in a game looking through lenses; I don't want my eyes to suffer from the same limitations lenses do. I want everything crispy as if I was there with my own eyes.

Mr. J.M. Kerr... if my scifi book gets published, could i interest you in making a film or series of it? 🎉 would be a lot of work though. Wish me luck!

Кажется у боке срез с другой стороны должен быть) И на моём гелиосе, и на других фотках в интернете срез у боке направлен в центр кадра, а у тебя от центра)

awesome one

First of all, credit your fn sources. You didnt come up with it before seeing the viral blender tut. And even he didnt credit nugget, who credited the original guy who tried it in ble der.

drive.google.com/drive/folders/1R2mFS1vFMhwHBqeowtFQFPrYEE9Wxutj -- the link